CLASSIFICATION//HANDLING RESTRICTION
-1-
● Identify how recommendation/options align with – or would require adjustments to – current policies.
● Clearly explain the differences between options or why alternative approaches are not recommended. Explain how any risks (financial, policy, reputational, etc.) or negative consequences would be mitigated.
● Note differences of view among stakeholders, where applicable.
● Where additional resources (financial, personnel, security, etc.) are required to implement a decision, indicate whether they are available or would need to be identified. Clear with M, DGHR, BP, and F as needed.
● Indicate any follow-on action (e.g., planning, engagements, etc.) or any subsequent decisions for S that may be required.
(U) Clearly identify any legislative or other deadlines associated with the decision. If the issue is particularly complex, you can attach brief additional background. Drafters should clear with all bureaus with equities in the issue.
(U) Do not use Action Memos to recommend a principal’s participation in a call, meeting, or event – use the Invitation Memo template. DO use Action Memos to request domestic or international travel, and provide justification in the background section.
Attachment(s):
Tab 1 – Supporting Document [if signature is recommended, list signature item as Tab 1]
Tab 2 – Additional Supporting Document [tabs should be numbered when there are two or more]
When uploading to Everest, please input the recommendations in the Action Memo. Under each recommendation, please include a brief description of each recommendation.
CLASSIFICATION//HANDLING RESTRICTION